Jump to content
Linguaholic

bibinchi9987767

Members
  • Posts

    1
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Converted

  • Native tongue
    deutsch
  • Fluent in
    German

bibinchi9987767's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. East Slavic languages = East Germanic languages East Germanic languages have svoystvami- extension is the only subfamily that 1 fully 2 died very little written evidence. Extinction accounts averaged 6 century AD. West German and Scandinavian groups remained, but the eastern died. Slavic languages also have a strange feature. Long time no one of them could not say anything. This is despite the fact that the language about what some Aboriginal Australia like that all at once it became known. Writing the Slavs begins abruptly with the 9th century, with the arrival of a certain Cyril. It is known that the Slavic and Germanic languages in the Indo-European family the next. These two oddities quite allow to come to two conclusions 1 Slavic languages - German 3 Germanic languages - Slavic. If we remove all of the Germanic languages the eastern branch, then in fact the whole structure flies. Nothing can be said about and Slavic languages, as the prior written history is silent. It is logical to take the exit point in the 6th century and the entry point in the 9th century. At the same time, we need to trust one single testimony of contemporaries about the Germans, but do not trust others. We must believe Tacitus that the Vandals, in principle, but does not believe Mauro Orbini, Marshal, Gerbenshteynu, Kranz, Dure, Spencer, and even Tatischev. The identification of the Slavs and the Vandals (ready) continues historians have of the XVIII century, for example, in the popular book by E. Gibbon's "The History of the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire" (1776-1787). Some interest in this regard are published in 1725 in Amsterdam "History Ruthenians" genealogical survey of German scientists J. Huebner (1725), S. Buchholz (1753) and M. von Baer (1759) Such an amount is not coincidence. We will not result in numerous other evidence, for example, that the Cyrillic alphabet is very similar to gotnitsu, the presence of such a country Gardarika on the territory of today's central Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, which describe the Scandinavians and thus refer to it as his own, that is, can understand people without an interpreter . Consider the well-known facts about the East German languages: We will not give ample evidence of the relationship of the eastern Slavic languages and Gothic language on vocabulary, direct indication of medieval scholars such as Mauro Orbini that the Russian - a Vandals, ie Goths that the Cyrillic alphabet is very similar to gotnitsu and other famous places or the presence of such a country Gardarika on the territory of today's central Russia, Ukraine, Belarus, which describe the Scandinavians and thus refer to it as his own, that is, people can understand without a translator. Add to this a single mythological space, such as Wotan Velez, Tor-Perun. Then it is clear that the "name" Rurik is not a stranger, but as his own in the truest sense. Burgundy language Some of the names are formed by diminutive suffix -ik- (Gibica, Adica, Remico). Likёrchik. Vandalic language It is known saying: "Scapia matzia ia drincan!" Explanation let's eat and drink. According to Russian: Skopje, let mattsat and drinkat ". Words archaic, however, we also recognize, for example, the word Zenk - eyes. Interestingly, both vandal compiled a list of Swadesh, if nothing from him did not survive? Lombardic language Word godahid - godohod? That is a walker from God or one who walks all year round? According to Lombard (dLinoborody) Scandinavia will be like Scadinavia. Bastarnsky language Known expression on it: «nesjataj is, adabo is mris" .What is translated as "save it, more he dies." Other languages yet give nothing, because in a strange way the mention of them there, but they are not examples. It Gerulsky language Gepidsky language Rugiysky language Yutsky language. Thus at a future reconstruction rannevostochnoslavyanogermanskogo language must be understood 1 changes due to the transition from runnitsy on the gothic alphabet, and then another in a number of countries in the Latin 2 historic loss, changes unintentional and intentional 3 errors when copying the written sources of the Middle Ages, etc. 4 Natural processes, such as, reduction of the -r, -h, metathesis. Many Germanic languages were adjusted several times to the standards, including in the form of the influence of the Latin language and -s, -um, and so on. N. With or without reason. For example Lombard word wittimon «wedding», trigildus «triple compensation" actually sound like wittima and trigildar - trigilda (-r reduction both in modern English, a change is not fixed in writing). Wittima. Tim in Old - count. View - as a prefix is, for example, in a Ukrainian - from. That is to count the spouses, rank them one to another. Trigilda. In Russian today is not the glory of guild (money for the West German), but there is a word of the debt, which is in the dictionaries of the Gothic language as daulga. Obviously, in the Gothic and Lombardic language occurred permutation - metathesis of consonants. Then we get trigilda - tridalga - three debt. Wittima. Tim in Old - count. View - as a prefix is, for example, in a Ukrainian - from. That is to count the spouses, rank them one to another. Trigilda. In Russian today is not the glory of guild (money for the West German), but there is a word of the debt, which is in the dictionaries of the Gothic language as daulga. Obviously, in the Gothic and Lombardic language occurred permutation - metathesis of consonants. Then we get trigilda - tridalga - three debt. What could have happened that left such a mess? Take the pan-European sources and Scandinavian sagas. We know that our ancestors were pagan Scandinavians, and the so-called Arians professed Vedic faith (not what it is now for the issue). It was not a pagan, but presupposes a complex picture with some supreme principle (such as Dao) and the local gods. So now it's preserved in India. One of the names is a faith - Arianism. However, Christianity be spread and went forward, and it was still united as split into Catholics and Orthodox took place only in 1054. One of the forms of adaptation of Christianity was taking it to the thesis that Jesus Christ is God's messenger, but not God. And though at first it suited the Church, but a little later, this has led to wars, including the so-called wars of Justinian. So, those who captured those assimilated. But the central Russia is far enough away to arrange her successful campaign: climate, prolixity, the ability to maneuver. And here we are already well worked and the so-called period of Mongol rule, which was not so in the guise of an external threat to erase the memory of the period 6-9 century. Ariane Christian period for the then already Orthodox, but inherited from one church postulate of the inadmissibility of Arianism, were far more dangerous than even the pagans, since 1 Jesus Christ is not the son of God 2 Christianity itself many took their Vedic approach, as Judah was trading point with India . There a lot of things, respectively in India and in terms of the ideas came. Thus, efforts in terms of further research is necessary to concentrate on finding sites vostgermanskih languages bath official conservative philology in their analysis of the relationship with the Sorbian, Polabian, Pomeranian language. It is known that the Polabian and Sorbian languages are formed by repeated relocation of Slavs (!) Of Novgorod and Pskov (as they are referred to the city of the Scandinavians), which confirms that the formation of the Slavic (German) language was largely in Central Russia (Gardariki). Value concepts of Germans and Slavs. The English call themselves anlosaksami, so there is nothing strange here.
×
×
  • Create New...