Jump to content
Linguaholic

Baburra

Members
  • Posts

    1015
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Baburra

  1. I think you should just stick with what appeals to you. It's hard enough to learn a whole new language, and it gets even harder when your heart's not in it, so it's quite important that you choose one that you would personally find value in. I think Japanese or Italian would be an excellent choice.

  2. I've heard that in some countries like Japan, it's hard to communicate in English, since the people aren't required to learn it, but I question if it is still an accurate assumption nowadays.

    I think that may be a little less true today, since information is a lot more available through internet and I think more Japanese people are getting exposed to the English language and culture a lot more, such as the wealth of American videos and comments on Youtube, for example. I suspect this is the situation as well for most other non-english speaking countries, what do you think?

  3. It is a pretty good way to casually get into a new language with less effort, I agree, since it does still play out a little bit like normal conversations. I think the best and easiest things to learn while watching these are the short phrases and daily used words, and it helps to see the emotion of the actors' faces alongside the words being used to get a more complete essence.

  4. I do not think of it as arrogance, a nation has a right to choose whether or not they should teach their citizens a foreign language or not. Japan doesn't teach their citizens many languages outside of their own, I assume, but yet they are not as demanded by the rest of the world to learn another language like they do Americans. I don't know what it is about America, maybe it's just because they are so widely visible through media.

    Anyway, my point is, no, it's not arrogance, it's just pride in one's own language and nation, and I think that's okay as long as we all still remember that we're all still only a part of one human race.

  5. I see it as a very good hobby to pursue. Not only is it inexpensive to learn, if it even costs anything at all nowadays, but it provides for a very good tool for when you do travel to the designated country of your choice in language or even just meet a person from there in your own country; and best of all, you can even make a living out of it, and seeing as language is a free and unlimited resource, you will never go out of business.

  6. I'm sure some of you have heard some "invented" terms once in a while, the ones that are said by the speaker because it will obviously be understood by the audience. The best example I have of this is when people use nouns as adjectives, such as saying "sirup-y" or "lemon-y".

    Of course, there are real ones like "woody" or "grainy", but as for the others, I wonder sometimes if they are officially recognized, but I sure do appreciate them. I understand things a lot more when they are compared to similar objects.

    What do you guys think of these? Do you have some other notable examples?

  7. Agreed. There are a lot of tips and tricks that someone who needed to practice will know that the natural speaker might not. I think this is true with most, if not all skills. On the contrary, there might also be some details that a native speaker might know of that a non-native speaker never picked up on. However, I think as far as basic learning goes, just in general, I think a non-native speaker might be able to empathize more with the whole experience, so like I said, yes I do agree. :)

  8. If it were me, I'd probably go for books like Harry Potter or the Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe. They are children's books, technically, but they are very mature in nature and not at all too easy to read. What I like about these types of books is that because they are supposedly made for children and adults, then they put in extra effort to make it entertaining because children are very easily bored, I think. That's just my take on it, at least.

  9. I think it's just the most practical way of testing, and I prefer it over other ways. Having the choices in front of you does make it a little easier, yes, but there are also the other optional answers that can confuse you, and I think that balances it out. The only problem with these types of exams is the luck factor, which I think is alright. Luck plays a role in real life as well, anyway, so it's not that much of an inaccurate representation of real situations.

×
×
  • Create New...