g2narat Posted March 10, 2014 Report Share Posted March 10, 2014 Of course! Poetry just wouldn't be the same if it had to be bound by grammar rules. Of course, the poem has to make some sort of sense but I think part of the beauty of poetry is that it doesn't follow conventional writing. And since grammar is something for conventional writing, poetry should be allowed to toss that to the side Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kandikkal Posted March 10, 2014 Report Share Posted March 10, 2014 I think it is fine to break some rules of grammar to convey your idea better. It is called poetic license and some authors do like to abuse this license .I found a gem on a website while searching for examples. Here it is,Three Ghostesses by AnonymousThree little ghostesses,Sitting on postesses,Eating buttered toastesses,Greasing their fistesses,Up to their wristesses,Oh, what beastessesTo make such feastesses! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hispoiema Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 To me, poetry is art. Art comes from within the soul. The soul is who the person is intrinsically, as a result of their culture, lifestyle and very own personality. So, yes, I think that poetry is allowed, "in my book", to break the rules in order to remain true to the one who wrote it. :-) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nyandroid Posted March 12, 2014 Report Share Posted March 12, 2014 e. e. cummings didn't follow grammatical rules and he became a very popular poet. I think poems are more artistic than they are literature, so I wanna say that style and grammar shouldn't matter if you can get your point across in an artistic way. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.