sayitwell Posted October 3, 2013 Report Share Posted October 3, 2013 For example: I bought tofu, spinach, onions and crackers at the store.Do you put a comma after the word "onions" in the above sentence? Or do you leave it as I put it, without the comma? I've never understood what the proper answer is to this dilemma. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Daedalus Posted October 3, 2013 Report Share Posted October 3, 2013 I think it is common in American English to put the comma there, but not in British English.Also, you may need a comma if the sentence is ambiguous.For example: "I bought a bag of crisps, salt and vinegar at the store." Does that mean you bought a bag of salt & vinegar flavoured crisps, or did you buy a bag of crisps, along with salt and vinegar?Adding a comma instantly tells us that in addition to the crisps, you also bought salt and vinegar: "I bought a bag of crisps, salt, and vinegar."Also see the Wikipedia article about the serial comma. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JessiFox Posted October 3, 2013 Report Share Posted October 3, 2013 The "Oxford comma" is generally regarded as unnecessary anymore in most list formats. However, I still prefer it and most professors I have had seem to have the same feelings...so I suppose it's often down to personal choice. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkaujntses Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 I think it is common in American English to put the comma there, but not in British English.Also, you may need a comma if the sentence is ambiguous.For example: "I bought a bag of crisps, salt and vinegar at the store." Does that mean you bought a bag of salt & vinegar flavoured crisps, or did you buy a bag of crisps, along with salt and vinegar?Adding a comma instantly tells us that in addition to the crisps, you also bought salt and vinegar: "I bought a bag of crisps, salt, and vinegar."Also see the Wikipedia article about the serial comma.I was taught to use the Oxford comma or serial comma. I do know that even though it's normal to use the serial comma in standard writing in America, American journalists never use it. Like Daedalus stated, it can be ambiguous sometimes. That's why I prefer to use the serial comma so there's no misunderstanding in my writing. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitwell Posted October 5, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 I think it is common in American English to put the comma there, but not in British English.Also, you may need a comma if the sentence is ambiguous.For example: "I bought a bag of crisps, salt and vinegar at the store." Does that mean you bought a bag of salt & vinegar flavoured crisps, or did you buy a bag of crisps, along with salt and vinegar?Adding a comma instantly tells us that in addition to the crisps, you also bought salt and vinegar: "I bought a bag of crisps, salt, and vinegar."Also see the Wikipedia article about the serial comma.Well that is interesting. I grew up in America but my father taught me to not put the comma before the word "and". Yet my schoolmasters often did tell me to put the comma before the word "and". I understand what you mean about using the comma to avoid ambiguity. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DiesIrae Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 I've always wondered about this although I've usually just do not use a comma before and. I would stick with this although I would be moving to the US soon, I'm wondering if it's a big deal over there. Not that it's hard to put an extra comma before and. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
madlibber Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 I always use the comma when making a list. It helps to show that each is its own thing, and that is also how my teachers taught me growing up. It can cause confusion if it is not there sometimes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ashwinr1 Posted October 5, 2013 Report Share Posted October 5, 2013 Just forget the rule books for a minute and think about this logically.A comma is used when you want to denote that there is another item in the list"And" is used in a sentence to denote the last item in the list.So when you used "and" obviously the item before it should not end with comma because the precise reason for using "and" is to show the end of the list while a comma is used to denote continuation of the list! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ghanashyam Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 No, I do not put the comma before and. The list has ended with and and therefore it does not stand the reason. This is the way, I was taught. I think some grammar rules can be safely ignored if they do not stand the reason. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LauraM Posted October 6, 2013 Report Share Posted October 6, 2013 I think it is common in American English to put the comma there, but not in British English.Also, you may need a comma if the sentence is ambiguous.For example: "I bought a bag of crisps, salt and vinegar at the store." Does that mean you bought a bag of salt & vinegar flavoured crisps, or did you buy a bag of crisps, along with salt and vinegar?Adding a comma instantly tells us that in addition to the crisps, you also bought salt and vinegar: "I bought a bag of crisps, salt, and vinegar."Also see the Wikipedia article about the serial comma.Thanks, Daedalus, for the explanation and the Wikipedia article. I agree with you that it's good to use the comma to eliminate any ambiguity as in the sentence you used as an example. I think the article is well worth reading as it sheds much light on when it's best to use the comma to avoid such ambiguity in meaning. The use of the serial or Oxford comma does vary partly by region as you point out; it's more widespread in the U.S. and less so in the UK. And, as the article points out, even in the U.S. there is some dispute among experts. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest akasha24 Posted October 8, 2013 Report Share Posted October 8, 2013 I never put commas before the word and. I don't think it is correct nor necessary. I learned English in London and I have never seen and never learned that a comma should come before the word and. The word but is a big question for me because sometimes I put a commas before it, sometimes I don't but I guess that's another topic. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miya Posted October 8, 2013 Report Share Posted October 8, 2013 When I was first studying English, I didn't put the comma before and. But after seeing authors do it so often in their books, I've started to do it as well.Here's another question for you all: Do you put a comma before "but"? Example: I would like to play, but I have to do homework. It's the same story for me. I didn't put the comma before but when I first started learning English. But then I saw it used in books and so I just started doing it too. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sayitwell Posted October 8, 2013 Author Report Share Posted October 8, 2013 When I was first studying English, I didn't put the comma before and. But after seeing authors do it so often in their books, I've started to do it as well.Here's another question for you all: Do you put a comma before "but"? Example: I would like to play, but I have to do homework. It's the same story for me. I didn't put the comma before but when I first started learning English. But then I saw it used in books and so I just started doing it too.No, I do not. I only put the comma before the word "but". I've seen many people do it but it is unnecessary for the same reasons that it is unnecessary before the word "and". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MVent_20 Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 Using a comma before the word "and" depends on the thought and construction of your sentence.A comma is usually used when merging two independent clauses.1. The car was taken by my sister, and was later found near her boyfriend's house.[The car was taken by my sister.] + [The car was later found near her boyfriend's house.]2. Carla started dancing ballet when she was 5 years old, and is now teaching ballet to kids.[Carla started dancing ballet when she was 5 years old.] + [Carla is now teaching ballet to kids.]If the independent clauses are short, there's no need to use a comma -- but it can still be used.eg.I drank scotch, and Shelley had water.I drank scotch and Shelley had water.When enumerating, a comma isn't supposed to be used before "and."eg.1. I would like a slice of bread with butter, strawberry jam, bacon on the side and orange juice.2. Exercising helps you stay fit and healthy. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miya Posted October 9, 2013 Report Share Posted October 9, 2013 No, I do not. I only put the comma before the word "but". I've seen many people do it but it is unnecessary for the same reasons that it is unnecessary before the word "and". It's so weird how it's unnecessary, yet people do it. My teachers used to tell me that commas were pauses in a sentence. But I never pause before "but" or "and", yet there are almost always commas there. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KC Posted October 13, 2013 Report Share Posted October 13, 2013 To me, your sentence structure seems correct. However, I will take the information from the other postings into consideration. There's always room to learn. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
calebmelvern Posted October 23, 2013 Report Share Posted October 23, 2013 This is one reason why the English language could be so frustrating at times. I usually don't use a comma before the word "and" unless doing so would make the sentence ambiguous. As others have said, this comes down to a matter of choice, as there isn't really a hard rule about this. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyDigitalpoint Posted October 23, 2013 Report Share Posted October 23, 2013 The "Oxford comma" is generally regarded as unnecessary anymore in most list formats. However, I still prefer it and most professors I have had seem to have the same feelings...so I suppose it's often down to personal choice.This is what the Writing Guide of the UtahState University says about the Oxford comma,31. When Do I Use Commas?C. In serial lists (containing three or more subjects, phrases, or clauses)I. Commas clarify items in a list that are connected by the concept of the thought, but otherwise disconnected from each other. In this case, always separate these items by commas—up to and including the last item. This is known as the Serial or Oxford comma. • Example: “Mesopotamia is better understood not only as a place but as a series of cultures that exhibited common beliefs, patterns of development, conquest and defeat, and who lived and died in an area roughly centered in the land between the rivers.” • Example: “Caesar was bold, brave, and successful.” II. Some departments and publishers will specifically request the omission of the Oxford comma. Always follow the guidelines of the party for whom you are writing. When it is not explicitly stated, however, employ the Oxford (see section 33 for rules on consistency).Full guide sections are found here, http://www.usu.edu/markdamen/WritingGuide/CGGS/311c.htm Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
superfalcons05 Posted October 24, 2013 Report Share Posted October 24, 2013 yes you put a comma before the and. Comma placement has always a issue for me. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zambothegreat Posted November 4, 2013 Report Share Posted November 4, 2013 This is what the Writing Guide of the UtahState University says about the Oxford comma,Full guide sections are found here, http://www.usu.edu/markdamen/WritingGuide/CGGS/311c.htmGood post. I tend to just use the Oxford comma, even when it's not a serial list. I wonder what kind of department or publisher would request that the Oxford comma not be used? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shannonbutler18 Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 According to English rules, there isn't supposed to be a comma after "and". It's supposed to be "I got mushrooms, pickles and relish." Not "I got mushrooms, pickles, and relish." Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justusforus Posted November 14, 2013 Report Share Posted November 14, 2013 I am in the US and I never use the comma after the item preceding "and" in the list. I was not taught that way and do not see it used that way very often. I say that with a big reservation as I may have seen it and assumed it was wrong. After reading the explanation as using it to denote the last item in the list preceding the "and" it makes sense, but it was not widely used or taught this way to my knowledge. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MyDigitalpoint Posted November 15, 2013 Report Share Posted November 15, 2013 This grammar reference makes reference to commas before a word:When Do I Use Commas?In serial lists (containing three or more subjects, phrases, or clauses)I. Commas clarify items in a list that are connected by the concept of the thought, but otherwise disconnected from each other. In this case, always separate these items by commas—up to and including the last item. This is known as the Serial or Oxford comma. • Example: “Mesopotamia is better understood not only as a place but as a series of cultures that exhibited common beliefs, patterns of development, conquest and defeat, and who lived and died in an area roughly centered in the land between the rivers.” • Example: “Caesar was bold, brave, and successful.” II. Some departments and publishers will specifically request the omission of the Oxford comma. Always follow the guidelines of the party for whom you are writing. When it is not explicitly stated, however, employ the Oxford. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Baburra Posted November 15, 2013 Report Share Posted November 15, 2013 Yes, I think the comma in this case is very important. It's not the most significant differentiator, I have to admit, and you can still get the idea of everything without it, but I think when it comes to writing, it pays to be as clear as you can be. I bought tofu, spinach, onions and crackers at the store.In your example, onions and crackers may be misconstrued as being in a group, whereas if you placed a comma before "and", there is absolutely no chance for the two things to be grouped.These are my friends - Tony, Charlie, Bryan and Steve.In this example, Bryan and Steve can be mistaken for a couple, in my opinion.These are my friends - Tony, Charlie, Bryan, and Steve.Much better. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
littleredcookbook Posted December 3, 2013 Report Share Posted December 3, 2013 The "Oxford comma" is generally regarded as unnecessary anymore in most list formats. However, I still prefer it and most professors I have had seem to have the same feelings...so I suppose it's often down to personal choice.Ugh, Oxford commas. Generally outdated but this is a debate that is NEVER going to die... so.... if you like commas, Laura, go for it. If not, leave 'em out. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.